If they decide not to ban him, then what about spending just $100? If still not, what about just $10? And finally, spend nothing (definitely banned)? So in between, there's a cut-off line above which an account is free from banning? Sounds ridiculous.Īs many said, there are A LOT OF ways to detect spoofers. Just before banning him, one employee found the spoofer's purchase history suggesting that he has spent over $1,000 on this game. It is this conflict between Paying Customers & Spoofers that holds Niantic off.Ĭonsider there's a spoofer detected by Niantic. I must say that I agree with such point of view. It's not that they cannot detect them, but they choose not to ban them(or hasn't decided how to). Some people argued () that there must be some payoffs from leaving spoofers unbanned from Niantic's perspective. Then it comes to the question that why there are still so many spoofers. I'm glad that almost everyone agrees that spoofing is unjustifiable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |